<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Failure is only deferred success</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makestupidityhistory.org/2005/07/25/failure-is-only-deferred-success/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makestupidityhistory.org/2005/07/25/failure-is-only-deferred-success/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to the eradication of stupidity worldwide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:14:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eva Kolosiek</title>
		<link>http://www.makestupidityhistory.org/2005/07/25/failure-is-only-deferred-success/#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>Eva Kolosiek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makestupidityhistory.org/2005/07/25/failure-is-only-deferred-success/#comment-732</guid>
		<description>I s&#039;pose this rules out &quot;flunk&quot;, &quot;screwed the pooch&quot; &amp; &quot;under-achieved&quot;. Does this mean 1 can no longer be fired? Now, they&#039;ll just be &quot;de-hired&quot;, &quot;employment-challenged&quot;, can&#039;t be downsized, as that has a negative connotation, so they&#039;re &quot;laterally moved&quot; from the ranks of the employed to the extended-vacationing w/o pay or benefits?!? To &quot;not fail&quot; implies success, so I reckon they&#039;d be succeeding in incompetence, ineptitude, etc. Hey, THAT explains a lot about the Obama/Biden administration, as those 2 are experts in those subjects!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I s&#8217;pose this rules out &#8220;flunk&#8221;, &#8220;screwed the pooch&#8221; &amp; &#8220;under-achieved&#8221;. Does this mean 1 can no longer be fired? Now, they&#8217;ll just be &#8220;de-hired&#8221;, &#8220;employment-challenged&#8221;, can&#8217;t be downsized, as that has a negative connotation, so they&#8217;re &#8220;laterally moved&#8221; from the ranks of the employed to the extended-vacationing w/o pay or benefits?!? To &#8220;not fail&#8221; implies success, so I reckon they&#8217;d be succeeding in incompetence, ineptitude, etc. Hey, THAT explains a lot about the Obama/Biden administration, as those 2 are experts in those subjects!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.043 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-05 09:16:28 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
